Why do Meta and Google both claim credit for the same sale?
You're spending real money based on numbers you can't quite trust anymore. Every platform says its own campaigns are working. Add up what Meta and Google both claim they brought you, and it's often more revenue than your store actually made.
Something in the middle is broken, and it's not your product or your creative.
Why ad platforms estimate sales instead of measuring them
Ad platforms track conversions using a browser pixel — a small script that fires when someone buys. That used to be reliable. It isn't anymore.
- iOS privacy changes block a large share of iPhone users from being tracked across apps at all
- Browsers and ad blockers quietly strip or delay pixel data before it reaches the platform
- Slow page loads and tab-closes lose the tracking call before it fires
When a platform can't see a sale directly, it doesn't just report zero. It estimates — using modelling that tends to lean generous toward itself. So Meta's dashboard and Google's dashboard can each show a good chunk of the same sale, on top of guessed sales that never happened.
You're not being lied to. You're being shown a platform's best guess, dressed up to look like a fact.
How GA4 and server-side tracking (CAPI) close the attribution gap
Why every ad platform grades its own homework
Every ad platform is graded on its own homework. Left unchecked, they'll all report themselves as the hero of your growth.
The businesses spending confidently on ads right now aren't the ones with the biggest budgets. They're the ones who stopped trusting the dashboard and built a source of truth underneath it.